I’m not exaggerating this pillock’s the sentiments in the title there. That is genuinely his argument.

Quote:

Provocative Female Attire is an Assault Against Men

Quote:

When a woman walks down a crowded sidewalk in revealing clothing, she is forcing herself on every man nearby.

Get off me ya darned sexy woman! All done up in those clothes wot I’ve deemed are sexy and kinda imply you have to wear in order to have any worth in society!

Quote:

She has chosen to advertise herself to everyone passing by, but she is looking only for a few men. The wealthiest, the most famous, the most powerful men she can attract. Yet her display is bound to be noticed by hundreds of men in whom she has no conceivable romantic interest.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Quote:

There’s an old elementary school custom…when you bring something tasty to class, it’s understood that you should put it away unless you intend to share it with others. The rationale:  It’s a distraction to the entire class.  The goodies are blatantly advertised without any possibility of fulfilling the promise of the advertisement for everyone.  It’s considered impolite to show off what you don’t intend to share.

You see... Your average woman isn’t a person. She’s a packet of sweets, or possibly a large pizza.

Quote:

However, looking for refuge in explicit written law is inherently disingenuous. As the more socially oriented sex, women know very well that most social rules are tacitly understood and rarely written down or spoken of.

Now, I know that sexual harassment and rape and stuff are “illegal” when you do simple stuff like read the law as written. But it’s just darn polite to make yourself available to be felt up by any bloke who wants to cop a feel as you wander down the street in a mini skirt. ‘Laws’ like that aren’t written down, they’re just common decency!

Quote:

When I studied abroad in Latin America during college, I was in a group of students from my school that consisted mostly of spoiled women.

Hang on. I’ll just run that through Google Translate.

Code:

When I studied abroad in Latin America during college, I was in a group of students from my school that consisted mostly of bitches who wouldn’t put out for me

Right.

Big quote here. Brace yourselves.

Quote:

They would insist on going out in low cut tops and become outraged when local men started catcalling at them. Rather than sharing their sense of righteous indignation, I found myself hiding a smile. It didn’t take me long to understand that tastefully dressed women never received catcalls. This sort of behavior was reserved for women who broke their side of the social contract. Back in the feminized West, I’d been well aware that the wolf whistle was one of the most despised and vilified of all possible male behaviors. And having actually experienced it in real life, I had a big red pill revelation. Catcalling, I realized, was a defense mechanism used by lower status men against women flaunting themselves publicly – for the benefit of millionaires only.

WOW!

I mean... WOW!

So... Once a woman dons a pair of tight jeans and a skimpy top she immediately puts out a psychosexual aura that not only says: “I’m in heat, come get some” to any passing fellas, but also defines an upper social level under which the woman will not make herself available to, and the only way the blokes around can let off their suddenly released sexual tension is to be a chauvinistic cock?

That’s some theory, right there.

But it’s not just that... Oh no. Women are far more devious and evil that that. You see... They know they do this, and they do it on purpose as some form of revenge for all that time when men they deemed beneath them could do the right thing and give them a good slap for being such a slut...

No. Seriously:

Quote:

They are reminded of horrible days of yore when Western women actually had social responsibilities – when even ‘loser’ males they considered beneath them could resort to public shaming when pushed too far. Present first world societies allow men no defense whatsoever against predatory and false female advertising.

It’s just not fair. In this modern, feminist-ruled world if a guy tries to hook up with a woman who is telling all the world that wants it by dressing all sexy, he not only finds out that the woman doesn’t want it after all, but then he gets the cops called on him for sexual harassment! The poor man just can’t win!

Quote:

Western Women don’t just abuse their incredible sexual power, they pathologically lie about their inability to understand the effects and implications of their actions. In fact, they seem to derive a sort of sociopathic pleasure from being able to sow unpleasantness and discord without consequence – all while playing innocent.

And they do it on purpose, the whores!

Quote:

Thus men are effectively strapped down, gagged, and muzzled while females can flaunt and taunt with impunity. For many men this pretty much sums up every single day of an entire lifetime at school and at work.

For me, that pretty much summed up that import DVD I picked up a few weeks ago. You have these women all in army uniforms and take their horse crops and ---I’ll just shut up now.

Quote:

They express their contempt and hatred for men even as they troll the populace for providers. Their enormous power comes without responsibility and they love it that way.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Quote:

For those who would doubt for a moment that these women know exactly what they’re doing, let’s take a look a recent events. How do Western women collectively respond when some male displeases them? In the most vengeful, derisive, and mocking way they know how. They call it a ‘SlutWalk.’

Or modern advertising. Either way DARN THOSE SEXY WOMENS AND THEIR SEXINESS!


ETA: If, for any reason, you choose to visit this arsecandle's webpage do not - DO NOT - visit the comments section. Not unless you have a decent supply of morphine or similar tranquillizer. I only got as far as two responses down and had to stop.

Take this as your warning!

Oh, wow. That's...

Quote:

She has chosen to advertise herself to everyone passing by, but she is looking only for a few men. The wealthiest, the most famous, the most powerful men she can attract.

Women make themselves attractive because they hope to find attractive men. What a shock.

Which doesn't necessarily need to be a whealthy or famous man, but... Oh right, women aren't desirous.

You know, this

Quote:

She has chosen to advertise herself to everyone passing by, but she is looking only for a few men. The wealthiest, the most famous, the most powerful men she can attract. Yet her display is bound to be noticed by hundreds of men in whom she has no conceivable romantic interest.

pissed me off right from the start. It denies the existence of every woman who's ever dated a guy next door or someone whose family had less money than hers.
I get this sort of urge to make this asshole as miserable as possible. But then this happened

Quote:

Thus men are effectively strapped down, gagged, and muzzled while females can flaunt and taunt with impunity. For many men this pretty much sums up every single day of an entire lifetime at school and at work.

and I felt happy again, because this guy is already so much more miserable than any outside influence could ever make him. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Ah yes, the age-old myth of 'women's sexual power', so incredibly strong that all men are bewitched by it, mere animals ruled by their dicks and balls.

If women really had the power to make men do whatever we wanted just by flashing a little cleavage, you'd all be labouring in the tampon mines. Instead even fat speccy bitches like me can't walk down the street in peace without some gibbon yelling something crude at her. And there's no shortage of other shitfucks to tell her she's overreacting when she complains about it.

Poor men, so weak-willed that the merest flash of ankle can set their feeble little hearts a-flutter and inflame them with sordid desires...

Jeez - this person doesn't only hate women, he hates men too. Or at least, doesn't credit them (or himself) with any intelligence or self-control.

Gilmartin, is that you?

Does this guy know about Loveshy?

Yo. Yo, neckbeard.

I don't flaunt these boobies for the likes of you.

Quote:

They express their contempt and hatred for men even as they troll the populace for providers. Their enormous power comes without responsibility and they love it that way.

Yes, women need to be more responsible for managing the sexual urges of men around them! Women should be responsible for everything, and men should be responsible for nothing, for after all men are good and pure and made in God's image and would never do anything wrong if it weren't for all those damned evil women!

...I do find his Marxist supplement for his Biblical misogyny rather intriguing though; this is one ideologically confused son of a bitch.

Quote:

My first book, The Eternal Solipsism of the Female Mind and Other Essays, is coming out soon. Click here to learn more about it.

Oh boy who's gonna sacrifice their sanity to rip this one to bits

Come on, it's going to feature such mind-boggling revelations as this:

Quote:

Why the feminist conception of rape is wrong, and how this has ruined the lives of men AND women in the West.

It always gives me a sort of warm glow inside when I realize guys like this are around, and my mere existence is slowly driving them insane. I feel like I'm accomplishing something without actually putting any real effort into it. And I don't dress in a manner that could be considered even remotely sexual, unless we're dealing with someone who just got out of the lock-down ward at Mt. Pleasant.

Honestly, sir, get a grip on it (preferably figuratively).

So two days ago I read a piece by PZ Meyers in which he scolds women for merely pointing out an incidence of minor sexism, ranting about how "embarrassed" he is and declaring that OTHER WOMEN EXPERIENCE REAL OPPRESSION. Then yesterday I read this thread.

Last night I had a dream about the S.C.U.M Manifesto. Seriously. Specifically, this part for some reason:

Valerie Solanas wrote:

His main means of attempting to prove [that he is a man] is screwing (Big Man with a Big Dick tearing off a Big Piece). Since he’s attempting to prove an error, he must `prove’ it again and again.

Thank you, Internet douchebags! Look who I'm subconsciously agreeing with thanks to you!

Let's say that what he says about women only dressing sexy in order to get rich men is true. They are then telling men what thye want, why should they keep going after her once she has told you that you are not what she is looking for? Is it not the same as you telling all those homosexual men about how you're not intrested in them?

I would love to ask someone like this that, but I tend to hate getting screamed at.....

Someone tell this dude that is takes money to look nice. If she's that smokin' hot and coordinated, she probably has a job already.

I wonder what would happen if a feminist website put out a bounty on the Voice For Men guys who are calling for a bounty on the Swedish women?

While I can accept and respect the opinion that "If a woman dresses provocatively she should expect male attention", it's going a little far to say "When a woman dresses provocatively she is pure evil, not only deliberately taunting men, but provoking them to sexually harrass her for the sole reason of turning them down."

Also, "Not only are men susceptible to their hormones upon seeing a cute ass, but they also deliberately punish women for having a cute ass by taunting them." This guy is insulting guys too.

You poor men... society is so oppressive towards your appetites nowadays...

Except, you know, there are too many people who would AGREE with this idiot and say women should only step outside when wearing the burqa.

The reason wolf-whistles and catcalls are frowned on is not because men are being stamped on, but because they're seen as incredibly immature; a sign of a guy who has no attitude to women other than thinking of them in a sexual way.

Eh, whether it's a burka or a micro kind it's still policing what women should and should not wear in order to be considered "appropriate" and "not a slut but a virgin and not frumpy and not enough to get catcalled or raped by someone who sadly has no personal issue sticking his dick in everyone"

I have the same response for him as I do all men who complain about women being nothing but sluts who can't or won't control themselves.

What would happen if we weren't attractive at all? What if we all looked like withered hags with boobs the shape of cow's utters and bodies that would leave even the strongest man crying to be struck blind?

We would all be extinct. End of story. And his mother wouldn't have been able to get his father to sit still enough to conceive him.

At least one good thing would have come of that.

Meh, we wouldn't go extinct. The survival instinct of a species is VERY VERY strong.

But this guy STILL reads like he thinks there should be a law against women trying to look attractive, whether for themselves, or other people.

"Women going out in public? Deliberately attracting attention? Can't have THAT!"

What really AMAZES me is that he doesn't pull out the old "RAPE!" card. Like how when people say that if a woman is raped she must have done something to deserve it, and all responsibility is on the guy.

He's also saying all women are snobby cows and that they should lower their standards. Women shouldn't aim for a guy who's handsome and well-off with a future! Women should accept whatever is handed to them! And they should be grateful if they get a dirt-poor, ugly as sin, stupid, small-minded man! Women have a place, and that place is whatever men give them! They should be grateful for being allowed to walk outside!

It shocks me to see people stupid enough to agree with him.